Trump Admin Exploring Deporation Of DC Guard Sh00ter’s Family

The Trump administration is considering whether to deport the family of the man accused of shooting two National Guard members in Washington, D.C., officials said Thursday. Federal authorities have identified the suspect as Rahmanullah Lakanwal, a 29-year-old Afghan national who allegedly opened fire near the White House on Wednesday, killing one Guard member and leaving another in critical condition.

During a Thursday exchange with NewsNation reporter Libbey Dean, President Donald Trump was asked whether he intends to remove Lakanwal’s wife and five children, who currently reside in Washington state.

“Well, we’re looking at that right now. We’re looking at the whole situation with family. Tragic situation,” Trump responded, according to the outlet.

Investigators say Lakanwal previously worked with the CIA in Afghanistan before immigrating to the United States in 2021. He arrived under the Biden administration’s Operation Allies Welcome program and later applied for asylum, which was approved after President Donald Trump took office.

In response to the shooting, the White House announced it will review green cards issued to citizens of 19 countries. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services has also suspended all pending immigration applications from Afghan nationals.

“At the direction of @POTUS, I have directed a full-scale, rigorous reexamination of every Green Card for every alien from every country of concern,” Joseph Edlow, the agency’s director, wrote on social platform X

On Thursday, Trump announced on social media that he plans to “permanently pause migration from all Third World Countries to allow the U.S. system to fully recover.” He didn’t name specific countries in his post.

Organizations like Afghan Evac, which helps resettle individuals from Afghanistan who have assisted U.S. troops, are worried that Afghan allies may be unfairly targeted by new immigration policies following the shooting.

“We can’t let the actions of one deranged individual totally vilify an entire population,” Shawn VanDiver, president of Afghan Evac, told NewsNation’s “Morning in America.”

U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro said Friday that Lakanwal will face a first degree murder charge. Pirro announced the upgraded charge after officials confirmed Thursday that one of the victims, 20-year-old Army Spc. Sarah Beckstrom, died from her injuries in a D.C. area hospital, the Washington Times reported.

The suspect is also facing three counts of possession of a firearm during a crime of violence and two counts of assault with intent to kill while armed.

Pirro said Friday on “Fox & Friends” that there are “many more charges to come,” including murder in the first degree. Beckstrom volunteered to work duty over the holiday, Pirro said, and “she ended up being shot ambush style on the cold streets of Washington, D.C.”

Lakanwal was arrested moments after the ambush near Farragut Square Park, two blocks from the White House. Reports said that he allegedly overstayed his visa and was living illegally in the U.S.He is charged with shooting Beckstrom and Air Force Staff Sgt. Andrew Wolfe, the latter of whom is still fighting for his life.

Both guardsmen were members of the West Virginia National Guard deployed to Washington at the request of President Trump to help strengthen safety in the city.

Beckstrom, of Webster Springs, West Virginia, served with the National Guard’s 863rd Military Police Company, 111th Engineer Brigade, and had been deployed in the District since August.

The shooting suspect arrived in the United States on Sept. 8, 2021, as part of the evacuation flights arranged under President Biden to remove Afghans who had assisted U.S. military forces during the fall of Kabul.

Senator Cory Booker Attempts to Shift Blame for Shutdown Amid Struggles of Food Stamp Recipients

As the fallout from the government shutdown continues to affect millions of Americans, Senator Cory Booker has launched a vocal campaign to deflect responsibility for the crisis, attempting to pin the blame on President Donald Trump.

Booker, along with many of his Democratic colleagues, has been critical of Trump’s stance on government funding and food stamp cuts, trying to portray him as the primary architect of the shutdown’s disastrous effects.

However, the reality of the situation is far more complex, and the blame should be laid squarely at the feet of Senate Democrats, particularly Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, whose refusal to engage in meaningful negotiations with Republicans ultimately brought the government to a grinding halt.

The government shutdown, which has left hundreds of thousands of federal employees furloughed and food stamp recipients facing cuts to their benefits, is a direct result of political infighting that prevented Congress from reaching an agreement on funding.

While the shutdown\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\’s impact on American families has been harsh, it’s important to understand that the blame cannot be placed solely on one political figure or party.

Rather, the failure to come to a resolution lies in the inability of Senate Democrats, under Schumer’s leadership, to compromise with their Republican counterparts.

Instead of negotiating in good faith to reach a funding agreement, Schumer and other key Democratic figures dug their heels in, holding out for a more progressive funding plan that would further their own agenda while ignoring the mounting consequences for the American people.

For Booker to now try to redirect the blame to Trump is nothing short of a political maneuver designed to shield his party from the fallout of their own actions.

By attempting to frame Trump as the villain behind the cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits, Booker is playing into the narrative of divisive politics that has plagued Washington for years.

His statements, while they may resonate with his political base, do little to address the real issues at hand. The facts remain clear: the shutdown happened because Senate Democrats, led by Schumer, refused to come to the table with Republicans to negotiate a compromise.

It’s important to remember that the shutdown did not occur in a vacuum. The debate over government funding has been an ongoing issue, with both parties offering vastly different visions for how the federal budget should be allocated.

While Republicans, led by Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, were willing to approve a funding plan that would have included a balanced approach to both defense and domestic programs, Democrats insisted on pushing for more liberal priorities, including a significant expansion of social welfare programs.

The gridlock created by these competing interests resulted in a political stalemate that ultimately led to the shutdown.

What Booker and other Democrats have conveniently ignored is the fact that the cuts to food stamps were not the result of a sudden change in policy by the Trump administration.

In fact, the Trump administration had been advocating for food stamp reforms and cuts for years, with the goal of reducing dependency on government assistance and encouraging work.

However, these reforms were not implemented unilaterally or without pushback. It was Congress — specifically the Senate — that failed to come together to pass a long-term funding bill that could have provided the necessary funding for food stamps and other vital social programs.

Had Senate Democrats been willing to engage in negotiations with Republicans, a more comprehensive solution could have been reached that would have protected food stamp recipients while still allowing for the necessary fiscal reforms to take place.

Instead, Schumer and his colleagues chose to play political games, prioritizing their own ideological goals over the well-being of the American people. As a result, the very families that Democrats claim to represent have been left vulnerable, struggling with the consequences of a shutdown that could have been avoided.

The truth is that the shutdown and the accompanying cuts to SNAP benefits represent a failure of leadership, not just from Republicans, but from Democrats as well.

Schumer and Booker, despite their rhetoric, have failed to recognize their role in this debacle. By focusing solely on blaming Trump, they are deflecting from the very real consequences of their own inaction.

This political game-playing has done nothing but harm American families, particularly those who rely on food stamps to make ends meet.

The impact of the shutdown has been devastating for many Americans, particularly those in low-income communities who rely on government assistance to survive.

For families already struggling with food insecurity, the cuts to SNAP benefits have only added to their burden. As the shutdown stretches on, the effects on these vulnerable populations are likely to worsen, with more families facing the prospect of going without the help they need.

While Booker and other Democrats may continue to point fingers at Trump, they must also come to terms with the fact that their own refusal to negotiate and compromise has exacerbated the crisis.

Instead of using the shutdown as an opportunity to score political points, it is time for both parties to acknowledge their responsibility in bringing about the current situation.

Democrats must take a hard look at their own actions and recognize that their failure to engage in meaningful negotiations with Republicans has left American families in a state of uncertainty.

Rather than focusing on Trump’s past policies, Booker and his colleagues should be asking themselves what they can do to address the immediate needs of the people they represent.

Moving forward, the focus should be on finding a path forward that can prevent future shutdowns and provide long-term solutions for vulnerable populations.

This means putting aside partisan differences and working together to create a funding plan that can support essential social programs while also addressing the nation’s fiscal challenges. Only through cooperation and compromise can the political gridlock that has plagued Washington be overcome.

The shutdown has exposed the deep divisions within the political landscape, but it has also highlighted the need for more pragmatic and thoughtful leadership.

It is clear that both parties need to take responsibility for the consequences of their actions, and that includes recognizing the harm caused by the current deadlock. The American people deserve better than the partisan bickering and political posturing that has dominated Washington in recent years.

As for Senator Booker, his attempt to shift blame for the shutdown onto Trump is a calculated move that does nothing to address the real issues at play.

Instead of trying to distract from the failure of Senate Democrats to negotiate in good faith, Booker should be focused on finding solutions that can help the families suffering as a result of the shutdown. Only by working together can Congress hope to resolve the current crisis and prevent future ones from occurring.

The government shutdown is a wake-up call for both parties. It is a reminder that the American people are tired of partisan gridlock and are demanding action.

As the shutdown continues to impact food stamp recipients and other vulnerable groups, it is up to lawmakers on both sides of the aisle to set aside their differences and work toward a solution that serves the best interests of the American people.

This should be the priority for every elected official, regardless of party affiliation. Only then can we begin to heal the divisions that have paralyzed Washington for far too long.