Adam Schiff LEFT SPEECHLESS As Congress Women Harriet Hageman & Paulina Luna EXPOSED Him In Congress
The Reckoning: Congresswomen Hageman and Luna Expose Adam Schiff’s Campaign of Deception
WASHINGTON, D.C. – The House of Representatives recently became the stage for a dramatic and meticulously detailed confrontation, as Representatives Harriet Hageman (R-WY) and Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) accused Representative Adam Schiff (D-CA) of systematically misleading the nation, abusing his position as Chair of the House Intelligence Committee, and wasting millions of taxpayer dollars on politically motivated investigations.
The privileged resolution brought by Republicans was framed not as a partisan attack, but as a crucial vote on integrity versus dishonor—a reckoning designed to hold Schiff accountable for what they characterized as four years of documented lies regarding the Russia collusion narrative.
Schiff, the perpetual antagonist of the Trump administration, found himself unable to hide behind classified information or procedural stalling, as Hageman and Luna delivered a coordinated, fact-based indictment of his public career.

The $32 Million Lie: Russia Collusion and Wasted Funds
The central charge against Adam Schiff focused on his aggressive promotion of the narrative that President Donald Trump colluded with Russia to steal the 2016 election—a claim that Hageman stated was proven to be “completely false by numerous investigations, including the Durham report.”
Financial Cost: Hageman immediately quantified the consequence of Schiff’s deception. She accused him of enabling the fraudulent spending of $32 million in taxpayer dollars for unnecessary investigations into a “made up crisis.”Wasting Public Trust: “This man occupied a position of the highest trust and authority,” Hageman asserted. “Schiff abused his privileges claiming to know the truth while leaving Americans in the dark about his web of lies… $32 million wasted, trust in Congress shattered, and the country divided.”
The most damning irony, Hageman noted, was that transcripts from Schiff’s own investigation showed that the Director of National Intelligence and the FBI Director had gone on record telling Schiff’s committee that there was no direct evidence for his criminal conspiracy. Yet, Schiff continued to push the narrative and actively fundraise off his “exploitation of Americans.”
The Weaponized Dossier and FISA Abuse
The attack escalated as Representatives Hageman and Luna methodically exposed Schiff’s actions regarding the infamous Steele Dossier and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant abuse.
The Steele Dossier as Fiction: Luna brought up the Steele Dossier, calling it a “fictional bedtime story Schiff once read into the congressional record like it was gospel.” She highlighted that the dossier—a folder of falsified and completely debunked collusion accusations—was funded by the Democrat party.
Luna quipped: “At least when Netflix makes fiction, they label it a series, not classified information.”
FISA and Civil Liberties: Hageman accused Schiff of manipulating the FISA process, stating he “lied about how the FBI and DOJ obtained and renewed a FISA warrant” and pushed a memo packed with “17 errors and omissions” to spy on U.S. citizen Carter Page.
“That wasn’t intel work,” Luna charged. “That was creative writing with a clearance badge.”
The members argued that this was not merely political overreach but an egregious abuse of access to classified information, knowingly used to violate American civil liberties and hamstring a duly elected president.
The Erosion of Institutional Integrity
The Republican condemnation transcended the specific scandals, focusing on the systematic damage Schiff inflicted upon the integrity of Congress itself.
Delegitimizing an Election: Hageman explicitly stated that Schiff’s actions were “designed to delegitimize the 2016 election and to hamstring the Trump administration.” She accused him of trying to “overturn” the election results by promoting a crisis based on falsehoods.Compulsive Deception: Hageman argued that Schiff’s lies had become “compulsive” and that if left unchecked, they “threaten the rule of law, our election integrity and the civil rights of his targets.”Contempt for the Public: The final argument, delivered in a coordinated fashion by Luna and Hageman, centered on the betrayal of public trust. They argued that if a lawmaker can lie repeatedly, misuse taxpayer money, and still keep his seat, it sends a message that “the cyclical pattern of lies has worn down the credibility of every institution.”
“This is not a partisan act,” Hageman concluded. “This is a clear vote between right and wrong. We will betray the people who trusted us and sent us here to do the right thing.”
Consequences and Accountability
Schiff, who sat “stone-faced” and likely “wishing he could call CNN for backup,” was unable to counter the methodical presentation of facts. The confrontation humiliated him with “facts, receipts, and a little well-placed sarcasm.”
The demand from the Republicans was clear: censure at minimum. They argued that Schiff’s years of deception had actively eroded public confidence, and accountability was necessary to restore integrity to the House.
The ultimate takeaway was simple: Adam Schiff built his career on lies, and on that day, those lies finally caught up to him. The confrontation served as a public warning that the era of relying on classified access and media protection to shield oneself from the truth is over, and that in this Congress, the truth is finally swimming back to the surface.